A Church gets it wrong, again
It is usually only tentatively that I comment on the doings of religious people not of The True Faith. However,
...if [the Archbishop of Canterbury] thinks that, by putting pressure on the gay priest Canon Jeffrey John to decline the post of Bishop of Reading, the problem will somehow go away, he is in for a rude shock. His decision won't endear him to the evangelicals who opposed his election, but will rightly anger the liberal opinion in the church that brought him to power - and all of this without solving the basic problem about the rights of gay people, who are accepted as individuals in the church, to take up positions of authority.
Read more of this excellent opinion here
It is also relevant to republish a well known letter, penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet several years ago: Laura Schlessinger is a US radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. She pronounced that homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned in any circumstance.
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to follow them.
a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odour for the Lord Lev. 1:9. The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and un-changing.
b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
e) I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
g) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.19:27. How should they die?
i) I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev.24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
Your devoted disciple and adoring fan,
The Guardian opinion piece (read it here
John Gower, the first poet in Britain to write in the vernacular, ... died in 1403. His most celebrated work, Confessio Amantis, contained a warning against homosexual love. [In his studies,] Dr John will have time to contemplate that not a lot in the church has changed since then.
Oh I don't know, I think they've accepted that the Earth goes round the Sun, haven't they?