Josh's joshings 'The buck starts here' Josh
"The finest and most perceptive blog in the entire Universe" - Jayson (not Tony) Blair
Email me *
How easy is it to recognise irony.
Big boys (& girls)
British Journalism Review*
Worth a look
The Feral Eye*
I live on your visits*
Jak - Vancouver*
Reflections in D minor*
Drabness is a state of mind
Sunday, March 02, 2003
During this past week, the media have reported the case of a Stockport man who takes exception to his management's dictating what he should wear for work (collar & tie). I am blogging my solidarity with him. Well done, Matthew Thompson.
You can read more about the case here.
Since time immemorial, I have opposed absurd standards of dress: I tried to get tax relief on suits that I would not have purchased other than to comply with restrictive work dress codes (I failed). I was greatly irritated when a female lawyer was granted similar relief for her "severe" working clothes.
This was particularly annoying because I had campaigned, this time successfully, for women to be allowed to wear trousers at work if they so wished. I was delighted to see that a woman recently won a big case against her employers. They had dismissed her for the persistent wearing of trousers.
I do not like tight collars and ties. Whenever "forced" to wear a tie, I wear it with the collar undone and the knot on my chest but I would rather not bother. Isn't it about time Trinny and Susannah devised new neckware for men? You know: something that's an obvious codpiece substitute but less uncomfortable to wear than a tight collar and tie or, indeed, a codpiece.
The only time a tight collar is acceptable is at the barber (to stop the cut hair going down one's neck), or with a dinner jacket (tux), or in the hangman's noose.
Perhaps that last style should be reserved for Pensions ministers whose department specifies absurd and sexist dress codes...
Comments: Post a Comment