Josh's joshings 'The buck starts here' Josh
"The finest and most perceptive blog in the entire Universe" - Jayson (not Tony) Blair
Email me *
How easy is it to recognise irony.
Big boys (& girls)
British Journalism Review*
Worth a look
The Feral Eye*
I live on your visits*
Jak - Vancouver*
Reflections in D minor*
Drabness is a state of mind
Thursday, August 29, 2002
A plea for a new Official Secrets Act
Many years ago, in a far off country, I was travelling on a train from point A to point B (OK - from New York to Boston) when I got into conversation with several other passengers. I was amazed to find that, of all the subjects they wanted to discuss, The Royal Family came top of the list. They all seemed to know much more about the whole silly business than I did. They were particularly horrified that I was uncertain about the names of some of the younger members. Apparently, this was the sort of information published in tabloid newspapers.
Recently, there was a case involving a northern footballer who had been, as it were, spreading his favours beyond the marriage bed. The cheeky chappie managed to get a series of court injunctions, forbidding the press to make his name public. Eventually, the injunction was overturned and his name was published. The newspaper concerned maintained that it was a matter of public interest.
The third example of trivia masquerading as news is the apparent importance of what is happening to the characters and/or the actors in soap operas. The tabloid newspapers frequently have this sort of stuff on their front pages.
Our government has, in the past, maintained that we need more freedom of information and, accordingly, that the Official Secrets Act needs to be reformed. Here are my suggestions for some new clauses in the revised act:
It shall be regarded as an offence to report any of the following:It is very important that we should keep secret what must be rightly regarded as secret. Is it possible that, with one inspired piece of legislation, we could 'persuade' editors to give us real news?
Comments: Post a Comment